Debunkng Atheism 03 - Evolution

28 المشاهدات· 24/03/25

Sayed Mahdi Modarresi
مشتركين

في محاضرات

‘Debunking Atheism’ is a short series by Sayed Mahdi Modarresi. See http://linktr.ee/Modarresi for social media accounts, articles, etc.

أظهر المزيد

Transcript

[0:46]long regarded as the atheist nuclear option the theory of evolution now

[0:58]appears more like a tiny bubble that's about to be burst by

[1:05]the merest of blows darwinian evolution has been touted as one of

[1:17]the strongest proofs of the hypothesis the theory the claim that this

[1:28]world has no creator and it's been used by atheists and some

[1:35]agnostics as an excuse to abandon faith in god and to try

[1:44]and undermine the intelligent design and incredible perfection and exquisite beauty of

[1:55]the world around us the idea that whatever exists in the world

[2:02]today as beautiful and as finely tuned as it is is the

[2:08]product of random natural processes and not the design of the creator

[2:18]of the universe now as i said perhaps in the early parts

[2:28]of the 20th century perhaps in the 1950s 60s the theory of

[2:36]evolution might have been celebrated by many and indeed it was introduced

[2:42]into the national curriculums of many western countries including the united states

[2:48]as of course at the time there were many other social changes

[2:54]that were taking place and religion was beginning to take a back

[3:00]seat and therefore the education educational system in western countries was used

[3:09]to present this the ideas of darwinian evolution as a counterweight to

[3:18]religion however the theory of evolution suffers from major flaws in its

[3:26]very design i will focus on three of those flaws in this

[3:34]session but i will also provide some further reading material and some

[3:38]references for you to check out insha allah after this lecture the

[3:47]first major flaw in the theory of evolution that i'd like to

[3:52]look at is the scientific inconsistencies of this theory after all it

[3:58]is but a theory it's a hypothesis they claim that there is

[4:04]overwhelming evidence to support it but in fact it remains a theory

[4:11]as opposed to a scientific fact and it it is you know

[4:17]it is a theory because it still suffers from a lot of

[4:22]scientific inconsistencies which we will look at the second major flaw in

[4:27]the theory of evolution is the problem of definitions and i'll explain

[4:31]what i mean by that essentially when people say theory of evolution

[4:36]they may be talking about certain things but those things do not

[4:43]further the cause of the theory in particular i want to look

[4:48]at micro versus macro evolution and the third major flaw in the

[4:53]theory of evolution is the fact that it's an exercise in futility

[4:57]meaning that it doesn't serve the intended purpose of refuting the need

[5:05]for an intelligent designer the need for a creator and god so

[5:09]we'll look at these three major critical flaws and problems within the

[5:16]theory of evolution in sha allah in the time that we have

[5:20]at this session the first one we said was the scientific inconsistencies

[5:24]of this theory so the first problem is that there is a

[5:29]mismatch timeline allow me to elaborate on that you see the information

[5:35]and overwhelming complexity of the information that exists whether it be in

[5:42]the dna or in life as a whole is so complex and

[5:51]so overwhelming that it could not have been generated by natural laws

[5:55]and random processes especially given a 4 billion year old earth and

[6:03]a 16 billion year old universe in other words the timeline if

[6:10]evolution is true then the timeline would have to be expanded by

[6:18]many factors over the 4 billion year age of our earth and

[6:25]the 16 billion year roughly 16 billion year timeline and age of

[6:32]the universe is simply not enough to account for the incredible complexity

[6:36]and the sheer amount of information that exists in this universe in

[6:42]fact in fact atheist philosopher thomas nagle who's a professor of philosophy

[6:50]at new york university wrote a book called mind and cosmos now

[6:54]remember he's an atheist and yet he says and i quote that

[7:00]there are two problems with darwinian evolution the first problem and we'll

[7:04]get back to that is the origin of life from non-living matter

[7:09]life emerging from non-living chemicals he says that it's impossible for random

[7:20]processes and natural laws to explain and account for the origin of

[7:26]life from non-living matter he says that atheists and evolutionary biologists simply

[7:34]cannot explain this so that's the first problem the second problem is

[7:40]the development of staggeringly diverse and highly complicated beings for example the

[7:48]brain i mean have you looked at a brain have you seen

[7:51]how complex it is have you seen the sheer amount of information

[7:55]that the brain processes and what it's capable of the sheer complexity

[8:02]of it he says could never be generated by natural and random

[8:09]processes then he says listen carefully to this he says i cannot

[8:15]bring myself to believe in darwinian evolution he says i hope i

[8:22]won't have to appeal to the god hypothesis this is who this

[8:27]is thomas nagle professor of philosophy he says that we have these

[8:37]problems that represent insurmountable hurdles before darwinian evolution and so he now

[8:45]finds himself having to grapple with the only possible alternative and so

[8:50]he says i hope i don't have to appeal to the god

[8:53]hypothesis he says that in the book he says because i don't

[8:59]want to live in a universe that has cosmic authority but at

[9:03]this point i'm stuck and i'm looking for options thomas nagle professor

[9:09]of philosophy at new york university now there is so much to

[9:14]unpack here number one the fact that he presents these insurmountable problems

[9:20]before darwinian evolution that he says there's no way we can explain

[9:25]these and number two the fact that he knows that the only

[9:30]other alternative is to believe in god but he doesn't want to

[9:33]succumb to that he doesn't want to surrender himself to what he

[9:39]calls cosmic authority because of other reasons because of prejudices and biases

[9:46]and a lack of interest in submitting to a higher authority the

[9:50]arrogance that i spoke about in the first session is i think

[9:55]we're seeing a living example of that right here in this book

[10:02]so there are scientific inconsistencies the time frame is one of them

[10:05]in the theory of evolution that simply could not be explained by

[10:11]the mechanisms we find in that theory the second critical flaw that

[10:19]i mentioned was the problem of definitions and i just want to

[10:21]take a few minutes to talk about this because it's very important

[10:25]then you know the nature of this session is that it's condensed

[10:29]it contains a lot of technical points and i could understand how

[10:34]it could be a little confusing for some but it is condensed

[10:38]and as i said i will give you some books to refer

[10:42]back to inshaallah at the end so the second critical flaw is

[10:47]that evolution is uh it is uh there are problems in definitions

[10:54]meaning it is not observable because by definition evolution takes millions of

[11:04]years supposedly and so what that means is that it renders the

[11:09]process of evolution beyond the scientific method the scientific method involves observation

[11:17]but no one has ever observed evolution taking place now i know

[11:23]some of you might be thinking that we have fossil records and

[11:29]we have vestigial organs and we have certain functions and we have

[11:37]organs within creatures and species that we can draw inferences from that

[11:41]would lead us to believe in evolution but see that's the operative

[11:45]word ultimately you have to believe you have to have faith in

[11:51]evolution being true and being factual because nobody has ever observed it

[11:56]taking place why because again they tell us that it takes millions

[12:02]of years and because our lives are much shorter than that time

[12:06]frame we have never observed it so setting aside the irony of

[12:14]atheists having to have faith in evolution as opposed to having real

[12:18]hard observable evidence which is ironic in itself because that's the you

[12:22]know that's one of the things they use against theists and against

[12:25]believers where they say that you have blind faith but this is

[12:28]blind faith right there before our very eyes but setting all up

[12:33]all of that aside the problem with evolution if defined if what

[12:39]you mean by evolution is macroevolution meaning the kind of evolution that

[12:45]would begin with uh certain chemicals and then evolving into the complex

[12:53]human beings that we see today in the 8.2 million other species

[12:55]if that is what you mean by evolution well number one it's

[13:00]not observable and number two we don't have any evidence of a

[13:06]change of kind of species right all the adaptations that take place

[13:16]right all of the changes that we have observed or we have

[13:20]evidence for they don't change one kind of animal to another right

[13:25]in other words cats have never been observed or there's never been

[13:34]any hard evidence of cats changing into dogs right cats are one

[13:39]kind of animal dogs are another kind of animal again we're not

[13:41]talking about speciesism we're not talking about adaptations we're talking about macro

[13:48]evolution there has never been any evidence of that never any observable

[13:54]hard evidence of that taking place all the examples that are presented

[13:59]are examples in micro evolution meaning one species of animal adapts and

[14:09]evolves and changes into the same species into the same kind in

[14:16]other words one type of moth fly into another kind of moth

[14:20]fly but you never see that moth changing and adapting and evolving

[14:26]into a bird or into a dog or into a squirrel or

[14:29]into a whale or into a fish or anything like that that

[14:33]has never ever been presented so there is a big difference between

[14:39]microevolution and macroevolution in order for the theory of evolution to even

[14:48]begin to think about undermining the need for a creator and an

[14:54]intelligent designer it would have to be it would have to work

[14:58]on a macro level not a micro level giving me an example

[15:03]of some kind of microbe developing a new function and changing into

[15:11]another microbe another species of microbe is not good enough you have

[15:16]to give us evidence where a reptile evolves into an amphibian for

[15:24]example or a fish evolving into a bird or even animals that

[15:30]resemble each other that look like each other we have none of

[15:36]that and so ultimately people who subscribe to evolution have to have

[15:44]a leap of faith they have to believe in something and that's

[15:49]why you'll see that evolution evolutionary scientists they often use the language

[15:54]like maybe perhaps probably there's no facts there's no hard evidence they'll

[16:04]say that maybe this happened right when in fact if you remember

[16:09]in the first session i read a verse on the holy quran

[16:14]where allah subhanahu wa says they have no knowledge of this instead

[16:23]they follow conjecture they don't have knowledge of this the problem is

[16:34]that conjecture and speculation will never replace the truth it'll never replace

[16:39]facts whereas this is exactly what we see when people discussing evolution

[16:45]right so they have to take a leap of faith and again

[16:50]the irony is that this is the problem they have with theists

[16:54]they say that you have faith in god well you have faith

[16:57]in some kind of theory somehow working itself out even though you

[17:02]don't have many of the essential components of that theory to even

[17:08]be called a scientific theory you don't have that for example they

[17:11]have what's called the missing link and they call it the missing

[17:16]link in other words it's not there it's missing it doesn't exist

[17:19]as far as the scientific uh the scientific body of evidence is

[17:23]concerned but they still believe that maybe hopefully at some point that

[17:28]missing link will emerge and it will solve their problem it will

[17:35]fill that gap remember we talked about the god of the gaps

[17:38]the atheist is the one that believes in the god of the

[17:44]gaps because their god is what they call scientific theories and they

[17:49]try to use that wherever they have a gap they'll say maybe

[17:54]maybe this may be that a very good example of this by

[17:56]the way is what's called the multiverse theorem and in a nutshell

[18:01]i don't want to get into it but they've tried to address

[18:05]one of the problems in creationism which is to account for the

[18:11]incredible complexity and fine-tuning of the universe and how if the universal

[18:19]laws of physics were to be changed even by the tiniest of

[18:23]fractions it would not have the capacity to produce life as we

[18:29]know it it wouldn't be able to function as well as it

[18:31]does today in fact it would be completely annihilated it will be

[18:35]completely destroyed it would never grow and develop the way it did

[18:39]and so in order to address this problem what they call the

[18:43]goldilocks theory they have come up with this idea that we don't

[18:48]just have one universe but we have an infinity of universes right

[18:53]how many they've suggested as high as 55 billion other universes and

[19:00]they've said that yes the reason this universe seems so fine-tuned for

[19:06]life to exist and for us to be able to do what

[19:10]we do today to think to contemplate to develop to grow because

[19:13]the the reason this universe is so highly finely tuned is because

[19:21]there have been 55 other billion universes and so surely that one

[19:26]of them is bound to have worked out one of them is

[19:28]bound to be as finely tuned as the one that we happen

[19:31]to be living in but see the problem with these atheists is

[19:38]that they will dismiss the existence of god with all the overwhelming

[19:41]evidence that there is for it only to then believe in something

[19:48]they have zero evidence for there is not a shred of evidence

[19:51]for the multiverse theory not a shred and so when asked about

[19:57]this when presented with this problem i remember there was an interview

[20:02]with richard dawkins and he he was asked point blank do you

[20:04]have any evidence for this and he said that we don't but

[20:08]i'm hoping that within the next 150 years or so that scientists

[20:13]or um or or cosmologists or physicists will be able to come

[20:19]up with some kind of evidence to back this up so he

[20:21]believes in something with zero evidence he has no qualms with that

[20:25]no problems with that only to dismiss belief in god which having

[20:29]read the quote by the philosopher thomas nagle it all makes sense

[20:36]because they simply don't have the desire to surrender to a higher

[20:42]being to a cosmic authority because they don't want to submit to

[20:48]that authority they will dismiss the most obvious effects and and make

[20:53]a leap of faith in the most ludicrous of ideas just to

[20:57]do exactly that so back to the second problem with the theory

[21:01]of evolution is that you have to decide which definition of evolution

[21:06]you're going to subscribe to you're going to accept is it micro

[21:09]evolution is it macro evolution if it's micro evolution we don't have

[21:15]a problem with that yes people adapt creatures and species will always

[21:21]adapt you know we we see for example people who lose their

[21:25]eyesight only to then have a heightened sense in their other senses

[21:29]for example their hearing becomes much stronger their sense of smell and

[21:33]touch becomes much stronger because they now have no ability to see

[21:37]and therefore they adapt we don't have a problem with that so

[21:42]adaptation and speciation we don't have an issue with it those are

[21:45]all examples of micro evolution but they do not account for the

[21:48]fact that life exists today and they cannot explain how life could

[21:56]have emerged from non-living chemicals and uh other objects this is all

[22:02]we have right so one of the issues that they'll say is

[22:06]that um evolution macroevolution that is is not observable because it takes

[22:14]millions of years by the way uh they say that there hasn't

[22:17]been much noticeable evolution meaning from one kind of animal one kind

[22:21]of creature to another over the last two million years which suggests

[22:27]again according to the fossil record this suggests to us listen carefully

[22:30]that two million years and we don't see any major evolutionary biology

[22:38]taking place now if that is true then for every new function

[22:44]for every change from one kind of animal to another it takes

[22:51]no less than two million years and if that is the case

[22:55]we go back to the first problem which is a timeline being

[23:01]inconsistent this means that it would take thousands of billions of years

[23:06]for evolution to work the way it's supposed to because remember evolution

[23:12]is based on trial and error evolution is mindless evolution depends on

[23:20]random mutations in the genetic code this is how they describe it

[23:24]if that's the case then again being trial and error it means

[23:31]that one function has to develop one creature turns into another and

[23:37]it would have to fail a thousand times before it actually works

[23:41]right on a cellular level it would have to fail so many

[23:49]times before it finally produces the function that is desired that it

[23:52]that helps it adapt and helps it survive right it's all about

[23:58]survival so it would take thousands and thousands of billions of years

[24:03]we're talking trillions and trillions which is why thomas nagel said that

[24:07]the theory of evolution and atheists will never be able to explain

[24:11]to me how we went from a to b given the timeline

[24:17]that we have right so there are many examples that have been

[24:21]presented which also contradict with the theory of evolution and the issue

[24:29]of macro versus microevolution again i don't want to get into that

[24:34]but one simple example which was again used and touted for so

[24:38]many decades about it being an example of poor design as well

[24:45]as evolution is the appendix right so they've said again i remember

[24:51]even as a child we used to read this in science textbooks

[24:53]they would say that the appendix is a vestigial organ it's an

[24:58]ancient relic it might have served some purpose in our ancestors you

[25:05]know 10 million years ago but now it's completely useless it serves

[25:09]no real purpose whatsoever which is why they used to suggest back

[25:13]then that if you can take out your appendix to avert any

[25:18]potential problems that could come up of pus and you know leftover

[25:23]food would end up there and causing it to inflame and cause

[25:29]all sorts of problems so they used to suggest that you you

[25:32]should probably take it out the same as with the wisdom tooth

[25:37]right but i'll focus on the appendix now so it was vestigial

[25:40]it was completely useless only to then i think back in 2017

[25:43]18 if i remember correctly researchers at duke university came up with

[25:48]an absolutely critical function for the appendix which involves storing of bacteria

[25:56]in times where there is an infection in the body and for

[26:01]example in the case of extreme diarrhea certain bacteria would be stored

[26:06]in the appendix and the bacteria would then be restored it would

[26:11]be used by the body to fight those uh those infections within

[26:17]the body thanks to the appendix in other words it's a pouch

[26:21]that stores critical medicine for the times that you so desperately need

[26:27]it but again all these years you've been told oh this is

[26:31]poor design this is vestigial this is an ancient relic this is

[26:34]proof of evolution and now we know that it in fact serves

[26:39]a very critical purpose indeed so problem number three i said that

[26:50]the third critical flaw in the theory of evolution is that it's

[26:53]an exercise in futility and it doesn't serve the intended purpose of

[26:57]refuting god and what that means is that even if let's say

[27:02]not just microevolution but let's say evolution is also true even though

[27:09]it has all those critical flaws right for example i didn't even

[27:13]get to talk about irreducible complexity right the fact that if you

[27:17]reverse engineer the evolutionary tree and you go all the way back

[27:22]to the first cell there are some basic functions in a cell

[27:26]which you cannot reduce further than that let me actually before i

[27:32]get to point number three i'll give you some example of that

[27:35]how did mammal see before we developed an evolved eyesight because again

[27:42]if you reverse engineer it all the way back to the point

[27:46]of inception then all of these functions didn't exist being able to

[27:50]see did not exist we didn't have the eyes right so prior

[27:54]to that how did we see how did we interact how did

[27:58]we mate how did we live how did we procure food right

[28:02]another example is the epiglottis do you know what the epiglottis it

[28:08]is it is it is your adam's apple right it is the

[28:13]organ or the apparatus that prevents food from going down your windpipe

[28:20]and ending up in your lungs without the epiglottis we would all

[28:26]choke to death every time we ate something because the food or

[28:30]the water would go down our windpipe and it would choke us

[28:33]to death it would kill us beautifully talks about this and he

[28:37]says he says human beings are so weak and vulnerable that they

[28:52]he he talks about his sympathy towards human beings and he says

[28:57]you know humans think that they're so big and strong and they

[28:59]can challenge anything and they can even challenge god wherein in fact

[29:06]the simplest things like taking a bite of food could end up

[29:09]choking him could end up killing us if the epiglottis didn't do

[29:14]what it was supposed to do if the epiglottis wasn't there we

[29:18]would die we couldn't survive we couldn't eat we couldn't store energy

[29:23]and food and the point here being and the question i'm asking

[29:30]you is how did we eat prior to the epiglottis evolving how

[29:36]did that happen and there's no answer for that there's no answer

[29:40]for that if you're being scientific of course evolutionary scientists will say

[29:45]well maybe this may be that but there is no factual basis

[29:48]for any of those answers another example as i said is irreducible

[29:53]complexity if you go back all the way to the to the

[29:56]first cell from which we evolved right there were some basic functions

[30:01]in that cell which you cannot reduce further because by definition evolution

[30:06]means that if you go all the way back all the way

[30:07]back you start out with some chemicals and those chemicals would somehow

[30:12]magically produce life right and ostensibly that life would involve some kind

[30:19]of a cellular mechanism well how do you go from those chemicals

[30:23]to that cell without being able to reduce the complexity of that

[30:28]cell i know again this is you know rather uh technical language

[30:31]but it is important that these are discussions that are uh that

[30:36]are being um presented in uh universities and at the level where

[30:40]theists and atheists are interacting with each other right irreducible complexity is

[30:46]a big problem for which they have no answer problem number three

[30:52]as i said was that it's an exercise in futility meaning that

[30:55]even if you did believe in evolution even if somehow you overcame

[30:59]all of those hurdles and answered all of those unanswered questions it

[31:05]doesn't take away the need for god i'll give you a couple

[31:10]of examples so many of you probably don't remember but back in

[31:16]the 90s there was this thing called the human genome or even

[31:20]prior to that the human genome project i think it was started

[31:22]in the 1960s if i'm not mistaken you're all familiar with the

[31:27]with the helix shape of the human dna right so this project

[31:30]was started by a number of individuals one of them was francis

[31:34]crick another was stephen another was francis collins so francis collins interestingly

[31:44]wrote a book and uh the the book's title is the language

[31:49]of god right that's also a recommended reading for you to uh

[31:53]to refer to the language of god in which he talks about

[31:59]how his discovery of the human genome mapping the human genetic code

[32:03]led him to belief in god that there was no other answer

[32:09]but to believe in god the sheer complexity and the amount of

[32:12]information in the dna forget everything else forget the human organs forget

[32:16]all the functions the dna itself which is at the core of

[32:21]the cell so the language of god another really good book by

[32:24]the way for those interested is by stephen meyer and he's written

[32:27]a number of books about about evolution and debunking evolution one of

[32:32]them is called darwin's doubt so do check that out if you're

[32:37]interested but i want to focus on one individual who was very

[32:40]much instrumental in the human genome project and that was francis crick

[32:45]he wrote a book called life itself and in order to overcome

[32:50]the hurdles of evolution of the biggest one being how life could

[32:55]emerge from non-living matter and non-living chemicals he says the following in

[33:04]a quote he says that some form of primordial life came to

[33:09]earth billions of years ago via spaceships and this life that came

[33:17]to earth was more evolved it was more evolved and he suggests

[33:24]that it was alien creatures in other words let me help you

[33:30]get this right in other words god didn't create this there was

[33:35]no intelligent designer there was no creator there was no god because

[33:42]they can't they don't have enough evidence for that right but they're

[33:47]happy to believe in aliens who came to the earth using spaceships

[33:52]to and he calls them primordial life in other words they've been

[33:58]around for infinity and they came here and they planted the human

[34:04]dna you see how ludicrous this is do you see how arrogant

[34:08]this is they're not willing to believe in god but they're willing

[34:13]to put their blind faith in something they have absolutely no evidence

[34:18]for what so ever the point i'm trying to make here is

[34:22]this is that even if we believe in evolution this process could

[34:28]not have been mindless it could not have been random it could

[34:33]not have been without some kind of designer supervising every single step

[34:40]of it it couldn't have happened because to have anything rather than

[34:45]nothing you need god to have life rather than death you need

[34:54]a creator the mere fact that we exist here today whether we've

[34:58]been evolved or not whether we've mutated or not whether we are

[35:04]able to fly which by the way if evolution is about um

[35:09]adaptation if evolution is about survival of the fittest surely being able

[35:15]to fly would have been at the top of the agenda of

[35:19]this mindless process that we call natural selection and evolution surely we

[35:23]should have been able to fly now because when it comes to

[35:28]our survival flying is absolutely integral if not just useful but again

[35:33]whether we have all those or not whether we believe in all

[35:36]of this or not you need to have a creator because how

[35:40]could you have anything rather than nothing without a god i'll wrap

[35:47]up with that inshallah we'll continue the discussion at the end of

[35:52]the day my dear brothers and sisters the quran speaks in a

[35:57]language that is intrinsic the quran doesn't need to resort to philosophical

[36:08]arguments instead it speaks a language that we all understand is there

[36:16]any doubt if you try to remove the cloud of suspicion and

[36:23]doubt and misconception if you clean the lenses of your glasses a

[36:31]little bit if you try to see the world for what it

[36:32]is and truly objectively observe the meticulous design the beautiful creation the

[36:45]fact that there is something rather than nothing you will come to

[36:51]the inevitable conclusion as francis collins did that god must exist when

[37:03]you observe the lives of people like hussein alaihissalam when you see

[37:16]how they interacted with the world around them when you see how

[37:21]they responded to the challenges around them when you see their kindness

[37:26]their compassion when you see their strength in the face of unspeakable

[37:33]tragedy you have no choice but to surrender to the very same

[37:40]truth that they subscribe to imam hussain looks down only to see

[37:48]his six-month-old sweetheart his beloved slaughtered from ear to ear [Music] and

[37:58]the first thing that he says is what makes this pain bearable

[38:08]for me what allows me to observe this sight and not die

[38:14]in grief and anguish is that i know [Music] he says oh

[38:32]allah if this pleases you then take until you are satisfied take

[38:39]everything i have to offer until you are pleased with me you

[38:47]are happy with me until you are pleased that this sacrifice won't

[38:51]go unrewarded until you are satisfied that the sacrifice of hussein and

[39:00]his family and his children and his companions and his brothers and

[39:04]his cousins is enough to spark faith in god for eternity that's

[39:11]why so many people discover god when they board the ark of

[39:18]hussain when they hear of the sacrifice of hussein [Music] this tragedy

[39:26]by the way is one of the single most painful on the

[39:31]heart of abba abdullah and the family of imam hussain which is

[39:36]why his daughter says that on the eve of the 11th of

[39:42]muharram i went out looking for my aunt zainab only to see

[39:48]her sitting by a pile of swords and spears and daggers i

[39:52]said to her my aunt zainab who are you talking to what

[39:56]is under all of this my aunt said to me this is

[40:04]your father then she says that i heard a faint voice coming

[40:09]from the pile of swords and spears and shields and the this

[40:14]is mentioned in these are the paul this is the poem of

[40:19]imam al-hussein he said there [Music] m [Music] oh my followers whenever

[40:57]you drink fresh water think of me whenever you hear someone is

[41:06]abandoned me [Music] was killed without a crime [Music] [Music] and if

[41:47]that wasn't enough they then trampled my body with the hooves of

[41:54]their horses after they killed me imam hussain mentions these tragedies to

[42:02]you and i but then he focuses on one tragedy which one

[42:09]is [Music] [Music] how i asked for water for my infant but

[42:43]they showed no mercy to me [Music] make us among his sincere

[43:25]servants oh allah make us among his loyal companions and supporters [Music]

[43:44]you

0 تعليقات

التالي

Debunkng Atheism 03 - Evolution

Transcript

التالي

استكشاف المزيد

يرجى ملاحظة أنه إذا كان عمرك أقل من 18 عامًا ، فلن تتمكن من الوصول إلى هذا الموقع.

التالي

Debunkng Atheism 03 - Evolution

Transcript

التالي

استكشاف المزيد

اختيار طريقة الدفع

لغة