Debunking Atheism 01 - God of the Gaps

13 المشاهدات· 24/03/25

Sayed Mahdi Modarresi
مشتركين

في محاضرات

‘Debunking Atheism’ is a short series by Sayed Mahdi Modarresi. See http://linktr.ee/Modarresi for social media accounts, articles, etc.

أظهر المزيد

Transcript

[0:47]my dear brothers and sisters one of the most absurd and ludicrous

[0:59]epistemological positions and philosophical stances is atheism without a doubt a person

[1:14]who identifies as an atheist is the single most arrogant individual to

[1:24]have ever existed in their day-to-day conduct they may be nice people

[1:32]they may exhibit demeanor that is rather friendly but to take this

[1:48]position of atheism and i'll explain what i mean by that and

[1:52]what the definition because there are many many different definitions for atheism

[1:57]while they try to project an image of absolute rationality and that

[2:08]they uh all follow the same basic principles the fact of the

[2:12]matter is that atheists are incredibly inconsistent and contradictory and even antagonistic

[2:20]towards one another depending on which position they take but suffice to

[2:29]say that atheism in its basic meaning is the most arrogant thing

[2:34]a person can subscribe to and the reason for that is very

[2:38]simple an atheist is by definition one who chooses to reject the

[2:45]notion of god and an intelligent designer and a creator and an

[2:51]originator for the universe and everything that's in it in other words

[2:58]by definition once again the word atheist is a negation of theism

[3:08]meaning that an atheist is one who categorically rejects the idea that

[3:17]this universe was created that they were created by an intelligent being

[3:23]by an omniscient omnipotent benevolent creator they reject all that and the

[3:31]reason i say it's so incredibly arrogant is because the same individuals

[3:38]who despite their fancy titles and their academic accolades and despite what

[3:45]they try to present as being intelligent and intellectual and smart and

[3:56]whatnot they themselves will be the first to acknowledge if they were

[4:00]honest with themselves they'll be the first to acknowledge that the amount

[4:05]of knowledge they have about this universe about their surroundings about the

[4:12]world we inhabit about themselves about their own bodies is so incredibly

[4:21]deficient and so limited that it pales in contrast to the amount

[4:28]of knowledge that they have yet to discover and explore in other

[4:37]words the amount of knowledge that's out there whether it is known

[4:41]by other people whether it's been discovered or whether it is yet

[4:45]to be discovered yet to be acquired dwarfs whatever knowledge we have

[4:53]about ourselves and about the universe so how could someone with such

[5:00]limited knowledge with such deficient intellect ever claim that there is categorically

[5:09]and absolutely no creator for the universe how could they know that

[5:14]how could they know that for a fact they can't which is

[5:22]why the shrewd and cunning atheists like richard dawkins and others at

[5:29]least they're smart enough to say that there is almost certainly no

[5:36]god because they can't come out and say there is certainly no

[5:40]god almost because they know that by saying there is certainly no

[5:45]god that they have absolute certainty that god doesn't exist that we

[5:50]will in fact hold them to account and we will remind them

[5:54]of their deficiency and their lack of knowledge and we will remind

[6:02]them that they know almost nothing about the universe so how could

[6:05]they know that god does not exist so this is what i'd

[6:11]like to explore in this lecture in sha allah we will go

[6:18]over some important discussions and arguments and facts and so if you'd

[6:24]like to take a pen and paper to make some notes that

[6:29]would be advisable the first thing i will read to you is

[6:33]a verse from the holy quran which once again highlights the fact

[6:36]that i have just presented to you the idea that people who

[6:44]reject god know nothing about the universe so how could they know

[6:48]for a fact that god doesn't exist listen to what allah says

[6:55]in surat he says and i quote they have no knowledge of

[7:02]any such thing knowledge meaning certainty they don't know for a fact

[7:12]they merely follow conjecture they follow their speculation and conjecture cannot replace

[7:30]the truth there's a big difference between conjecture or speculation and certainty

[7:38]and truth big differences between these two conjecture is to make certain

[7:46]assumptions conjecture is to say i heard a loud noise from outside

[7:52]the window overlooking the road and so you make a certain theory

[8:00]a certain set of assumptions based on that your first instinct might

[8:03]say that it must have been a an accident involving one or

[8:10]two automobiles right but you don't know that for a fact maybe

[8:15]that noise was as a result of construction work going haywire maybe

[8:21]there is construction material bricks being lifted and they fall to the

[8:28]ground maybe the noise came from an explosion and a gas canister

[8:33]maybe the noise was manufactured you don't know for a fact and

[8:39]so this is what's called conjecture you make a series of assumptions

[8:46]based on inferences right at any point in the chain of inference

[8:51]if there is a mistake being made if your perception was weak

[8:59]if the facts are not presented to you as facts then you

[9:02]could very much make a mistake and so what allah says in

[9:07]this verse is that those who tell you that god doesn't exist

[9:09]they don't know that even they will be the first to acknowledge

[9:13]again if they were honest if they were truthful with themselves then

[9:20]they would acknowledge that they don't know that for a fact they

[9:25]have no certainty of it so allah says conjecture cannot replace the

[9:33]truth when it comes to such incredibly enormous questions like whether or

[9:40]not god created the universe and therefore gave it purpose versus the

[9:47]fantastical fairy tale of atheists which says that this universe was created

[9:53]by a random series of forces and therefore rendering the entire universe

[10:01]purposeless when it comes to such incredibly important and enormous questions of

[10:09]an existential nature you cannot rely on conjecture you have to have

[10:16]certainty you have to believe in the truth and if you don't

[10:19]have sufficient evidence to give you certainty about the lack of god's

[10:25]existence then you cannot simply dismiss that and say no we don't

[10:30]believe in god when you don't know that for a fact listen

[10:34]to the second verse it's incredible this was in surah the previous

[10:37]one was verse number 25 and 28 rather in surat this one

[10:43]is verse number five and surah allah they have no knowledge of

[10:53]this knowledge meaning certainty and neither did their parents their ancestors grievous

[11:07]is the word that comes out of their mouths this is a

[11:12]big bold statement that you're making by saying that i'm an atheist

[11:16]meaning i know for a fact that god doesn't exist i have

[11:22]certainty that god does not exist right you are making a grievous

[11:26]statement that comes out of your mouths then allah says they say

[11:34]nothing but lie a lie because again it's one thing to say

[11:42]that i don't know whether god exists see that's the difference between

[11:46]agnosticism and atheism an agnostic is at least honest enough while he

[11:54]is incredibly uh ignorant but he is more honest than the atheist

[12:03]who is devious there's a difference between being ignorant and being devious

[12:10]and demonic the agnostic will say i don't know whether god exists

[12:16]or not i don't have all the facts i'm not fully convinced

[12:18]one way or the other right and of course at that point

[12:24]we can have a conversation we can have an honest discussion about

[12:28]the existence of god as we will do in sha allah in

[12:32]the coming nights we will present the arguments we will talk about

[12:37]the arguments that prove without a shadow and a speck of doubt

[12:44]that god is the most undeniable fact in this entire universe when

[12:52]the person is honest enough to say that i don't know one

[12:56]way or the other but an atheist says god does not exist

[13:01]does not meaning that they have definitive proof that god doesn't exist

[13:08]which they can never claim to have this is the biggest lie

[13:13]which is how and why allah subhanahu wa so incredibly says that

[13:18]this is a grievous word they have no knowledge of this neither

[13:22]did their ancestors they have no uh this is a grievous word

[13:24]that comes out of their of their mouth they say not but

[13:29]a lie they're lying and they know they're lying so what we

[13:34]will do inshaallah in the next few days and nights over the

[13:40]next five nights as we explore this incredibly important discussion about the

[13:48]existence of god versus atheism and the arguments or the pseudo-intellectual arguments

[13:53]that are presented by atheists we will discuss these insha allah particularly

[14:02]highlighting the major arguments and then debunking them in the process and

[14:09]the reason i think this is an important discussion is because atheism

[14:12]is now more powerful than ever it is backed by big money

[14:20]it's backed by massive international conglomerates and corporations and media behemoths it

[14:29]is backed by governments and by influential politicians which is why you

[14:34]see that a lot of our youth are exposed to these arguments

[14:40]at school or universities or when exploring social media and so it's

[14:48]important that we address them and that we try and debunk them

[14:56]in sha allah the first argument that i would like to explore

[15:01]with you uh on this first night is an argument that is

[15:08]often presented in this very brief and a seemingly smart and succinct

[15:16]form essentially they call god or at least the god of the

[15:24]theists the god of the gaps the argument quite simply says that

[15:32]theists and believers and people who subscribe to divine revelations they only

[15:42]believe in god because there are natural phenomena that they cannot explain

[15:47]and historically the reason people have believed in god is because they

[15:52]couldn't explain so many things that happen around them and in order

[15:57]to fill that knowledge gap within them in order to help explain

[16:02]those phenomena and provide some kind some measure of relief they attribute

[16:11]those natural phenomena to god right hence the title god of the

[16:18]gaps now in order to debunk this in order to deconstruct it

[16:24]and to undermine the basic premise behind this atheistic argument we have

[16:30]to start with a number of important introductions and i'll start with

[16:36]a definition in fact there's a an expression a term uh referred

[16:41]to as scientism and scientism essentially means that science is the only

[16:49]way to knowing the truth you see many of you will go

[16:53]to universities and attend lectures by these so-called intellectuals and one thing

[17:02]that continuously gets hammered is the idea that science supersedes all that

[17:11]science is the only way in fact to know the truth right

[17:16]so this is what scientism actually means so for example bertrand russell

[17:24]who was a foremost logician he says and i quote what science

[17:29]cannot tell us mankind cannot know so this again is a basic

[17:35]rendition of the idea of scientism that it's the only way to

[17:45]knowing the truth to learning about facts is through science so what

[17:50]science cannot tell us mankind cannot know the problem is that despite

[17:58]the fact that bertrand russell was a logician and a mathematician his

[18:03]logic really failed him when he uttered these words right in fact

[18:12]this statement by bertrand russell is what we refer to as a

[18:15]logically incoherent statement and allow me to explain why you see is

[18:24]it is this statement a statement of science in other words do

[18:31]you have empirical evidence that empirical evidence which is another expression for

[18:41]science that empirical evidence is the only means to the truth do

[18:45]you have empirical evidence for that do you have scientific evidence to

[18:49]present that science is the only way to learning the truth you

[18:54]don't see the problem with this statement and as i said it's

[18:59]called a logically incoherent statement because if it's true then it's false

[19:04]i don't know if that makes any sense to you if it's

[19:09]true that science is the only means to knowing the truth and

[19:16]that as we said empirical evidence is the only means to acquiring

[19:25]knowledge and to reaching the truth then this statement becomes false as

[19:35]i said it's a logically incoherent statement because this statement is not

[19:43]a science a statement of science right because we have no uh

[19:46]as i said uh no uh empirical evidence to back up this

[19:56]statement right um so far more sensible than bertrand russell is the

[20:09]lebanese-born nobel prize winner sir peter madower sir peter madower as i

[20:14]said was a nobel laureate he wrote a book very aptly and

[20:20]interestingly titled the limits of science listen to what he says in

[20:25]that book trying to explain and elucidate and elaborate on the idea

[20:31]that science is limited and deficient in itself science can never be

[20:36]the only means to learning the truth to knowing everything there there

[20:40]is to know in this universe listen to what he says he

[20:42]says it is so easy to see the limits of science how

[20:47]in that it cannot answer the basic questions of a child and

[20:53]he gives examples why am i here you know how sometimes you

[20:59]sit with children and you're trying to tell them a story or

[21:03]impart any kind of wisdom or knowledge that you might have but

[21:08]then they suddenly jump and they ask you a question that you

[21:12]weren't prepared for and these are usually deep probing existential type of

[21:19]questions even though they're children but notice how these questions will reveal

[21:26]the inherent impotence of science and the deficiency of science we're not

[21:32]against science by the way we're not saying that science should be

[21:37]thrown out but we need to acknowledge the limitations of it so

[21:41]when a child says to you why am i here where did

[21:46]i come from what's the purpose of life how can science answer

[21:52]these questions science simply doesn't have an answer to these questions even

[21:57]though they're presented by a child which tells you just how limited

[22:02]science and fact is the main point here is that rationality is

[22:07]bigger than science rationality is what bigger than science which is why

[22:16]einstein understood this fully einstein says that you can speak of the

[22:24]ethical foundations of science but you cannot speak of the scientific foundations

[22:30]of ethics in other words ethics is a discipline that is distinct

[22:38]from science and in fact ethics is what guides scientific exploration ethics

[22:47]that's why in research labs and university hospitals and many other scientific

[22:58]organizations and departments you often have what they call an ethics board

[23:05]and an ethics board usually oversees what the scientists do and what

[23:08]they're able to do what they're not able to do whether stem

[23:12]cell research is is ethical or not so the it's it's the

[23:17]ethicists that give guidance to the scientists and not the other way

[23:21]around which is exactly what's what einstein is talking about here again

[23:25]this proves the fact that rationality is bigger than science which completely

[23:32]undermines the premise of scientism that science and empirical evidence are the

[23:39]only ways to learning the truth this undermines all of that right

[23:44]in other words there are realms into which science cannot go right

[23:52]so let's go back to the argument that's often presented by atheists

[24:00]which is summarized in the statement god of the gaps we said

[24:07]what that means or what they try to suggest by that essentially

[24:11]i'll give you an example they say that in previous times we

[24:20]didn't know how rain worked we didn't understand the process by which

[24:26]water came from the sky and so as a result of that

[24:33]we attributed this to god we said this is a miracle god

[24:34]is doing it and everybody was happy no one had a problem

[24:41]with that but then mankind studied atmospheric physics and with science advancing

[24:50]in multiple disciplines they then understood the process of precipitation they understood

[24:58]how water vapor from the ocean would go up due to the

[25:05]difference in mass and it would then condense in the sky in

[25:12]the form of clouds and they would then because of the difference

[25:16]in temperature and whatnot that would then produce rain water and so

[25:21]once we discovered the process by which rain worked at that point

[25:26]we didn't really need god any longer because that is not a

[25:31]gap in our knowledge anymore right our knowledge is now complete we

[25:37]fully understand how the process works how the mechanism works we don't

[25:41]need god as an explanation of how it worked right the problem

[25:46]with this is that it is once again an incredibly absurd and

[25:53]ludicrous statement when sir isaac newton discovered gravity and created a mathematical

[26:03]model to describe the underpinnings of this incredibly important for force in

[26:11]the universe he didn't then say well i can cross off god

[26:17]because i now understand how the apple falls from the tree he

[26:21]didn't say which is a myth by the way but you get

[26:23]my point he didn't say that we don't we no longer believe

[26:27]in god because now we understand how gravity works instead he went

[26:33]back to his lab and he wrote one of the most brilliant

[26:38]works of science called the principia mathematica in which he explored the

[26:47]mathematical descriptions of gravity so that the thinking man could also believe

[26:58]in god the one who lacks knowledge will attribute the natural phenomenon

[27:03]to god fine now the one who has knowledge the one who

[27:09]understands how gravity worked is also able to appreciate the work of

[27:17]god you see stephen hawkings let me give you a quote here

[27:24]right stephen hawking says that you must choose between gravity and god

[27:30]once again he is resorting back to scientism he is saying that

[27:37]since we now understand how gravity works and how different bodies in

[27:45]the universe are attracted to each other thanks to gravity's thanks to

[27:51]the gravitational pull therefore we don't need to believe in god anymore

[27:55]but why why does it have to be either or if i

[28:02]told you listen to this example if i said here is an

[28:07]incredibly fast car let's say the bugatti chiron super sport or the

[28:16]koenigsegg agera or the ssc tuatara now these are cars that are

[28:26]approaching the previously mythical and downright impossible 300 miles per hour speed

[28:32]limit okay these are pushing the envelope these are some of the

[28:37]fastest cars in the world today production cars and then i said

[28:43]to you explain to me how a chunk of metal can somehow

[28:49]produce an engine that has 1750 horsepower and can propel all of

[29:01]this mass to such exceedingly incredible speeds and i'll give you two

[29:08]options option number one it is the law of thermo excuse me

[29:11]the law of internal combustion and number two it is mr jarrett

[29:18]shelby now choose your response would be what a absurd notion that

[29:24]you have to choose between one or the other either it is

[29:29]the law of internal combustion which is the mechanism that underlines the

[29:34]way these cars are able to function and to go at these

[29:39]incredibly fast speeds or jared shelby who was the designer of the

[29:44]essencey tuatara the agent responsible for putting all of this together designing

[29:51]it and making it work why does it have to be one

[29:56]or the other do you see what i'm trying to say in

[29:59]other words both of these answers are equally correct one explains the

[30:06]law of internal combustion explains the mechanism by which the cars are

[30:12]able to drive so fast and the other is the agent responsible

[30:16]for the production and design and manufacture of the car they're both

[30:24]equally accurate they're both logical answers so the idea that it has

[30:30]to be either or is completely absurd in other words now that

[30:38]we have a scientific explanation for how rain develops now that we

[30:44]have a scientific description of the way gravity works does not negate

[30:53]the need for a designer does not negate and do away with

[30:57]the need for a an agent responsible for the mechanism in fact

[31:04]the more complex the mechanism the greater the need for who the

[31:10]agent responsible for the mechanism which is why the more i learn

[31:16]brothers and sisters the more i discover the more knowledge i acquire

[31:20]the more at all i am left at the grandeur of the

[31:27]creator of the universe the more amazing and the more humbling it

[31:34]is for us to sit at the majesty of the creator of

[31:37]the universe because previously when we didn't know how rain worked we

[31:44]didn't have an explanation it didn't seem like a complex thing people

[31:50]might have prayed and then the rain would then come so it's

[31:55]not a very complex thing now that we know how complex it

[32:00]is now that we know how many different forces have to come

[32:03]together for rain to actually develop and for water to come down

[32:10]and nourish the earth and cultivate the land and produce all of

[32:18]the vegetation and sustain life as we know it now that we

[32:21]understand this it should make us even more humble in the presence

[32:28]of god knowing that the agent responsible for this reign is so

[32:35]incredibly wise so powerful so omniscient so omnipotent so benevolent and so

[32:46]einstein another quote he says the only incomprehensible thing about the universe

[32:54]is that it's comprehensible i hope you understand what that means in

[33:02]other words he says that the one thing that baffles me about

[33:06]this world and i can't explain it is that i can somehow

[33:16]understand this universe i can sit down and speak and marvel about

[33:21]the exquisite nature of this universe he says i can't understand that

[33:29]why because and to rephrase what einstein is saying how could a

[33:36]chunk of nerve cells and goo that is the human brain how

[33:41]could that even begin to speak about the marvels and the miracles

[33:45]of this universe in other words to re-phrase what einstein is saying

[33:53]here is how could a chunk of nerve cells and goo that

[33:56]is the human brain even begin to talk about these you know

[34:02]incredible marvels of the universe how could we even marvel how could

[34:09]we begin to appreciate the beauty the exquisite design in this universe

[34:15]the cosmos is so infinitesimally large and yet we can even sit

[34:22]down and discuss the size of the cosmos how could a human

[34:29]being as deficient as i and everybody else even discuss these concepts

[34:34]that perplexed einstein he cannot fathom for the life of him how

[34:40]we are able to comprehend the universe and to marvel at its

[34:48]beauty and the answer by the way through the conundrum that perplexed

[34:50]einstein is found in the holy quran allah subhana wa ta'ala says

[34:58]we have truly honored the children of adam we have given them

[35:03]the intellect we have given them the ability to think we have

[35:06]given given them the rational judgment by which they can make deductions

[35:12]and understand the world around them imam al-hussein says in arafat the

[35:24]dua that's been attributed to abba hussain he talks about this and

[35:30]he says speaking about his deficiencies and his inadequacies and his weaknesses

[35:40]as a human being he says oh lord i am poor even

[35:46]when i am rich fake then how could i not be poor

[35:54]when i am actually poor well i am exceedingly ignorant even when

[36:03]i possess knowledge how could i then not be ignorant when i

[36:12]am actually ignorant o lord what comes out of me only befits

[36:23]my malevolence and what comes from you is something that befits your

[36:37]benevolence malevolence on my part benevolence on your part oh lord when

[36:49]virtues emerge and surface from me when i do good things then

[36:55]it is by your favor and you have every right to say

[37:01]that i gave you this.

[37:05]and when vices emerge from me when evil acts come out of

[37:12]me fabiadlike it is by your justice and you have fulfilled the

[37:20]proof upon me illahi ima how benevolent and kind and compassionate are

[37:26]you towards me and my ignorance despite of my ignorance and how

[37:37]merciful are you in spite of my evil actions you know when

[37:43]if you see someone who's acting like a child who's not being

[37:46]righteous or good and is exhibiting evil behavior you throw them out

[37:52]you let them be you turn your back to them you leave

[37:57]them alone and yet allah subhanahu wa ta'ala sticks by us and

[38:00]looks after us and shows us nothing by but mercy despite of

[38:05]all of these evil actions and malevolent deeds oh lord how close

[38:15]are you to me and how far am i from oh lord

[38:26]you're so kind and merciful towards me what is it that prevents

[38:33]me from having access to you and that shields me from you

[38:37]and makes me distracted and away from you this is the point

[38:44]i was leading up to oh lord blind is the i that

[38:53]does not see you observing it looking after it and at a

[39:06]loss is a transaction which does not encompass your love as part

[39:11]of the deal as part of the trade in other words without

[39:16]your love no matter how much money we make no matter how

[39:18]much property we possess no matter how what we have in this

[39:24]world is all meaningless it's all worthless if god isn't in the

[39:31]equation if god and his presence is not taken into account inshaallah

[39:35]we will continue our discussion on the ludicrous arguments made by atheists

[39:41]in the coming nights but tonight i want to take you to

[39:48]a person who despite her young age is living proof of the

[39:58]existence of allah subhanahu wa'ta'ala i am of course talking about the

[40:05]daughter of imam al-hussein the three-year-old orphan of abba abdullah whose devotion

[40:12]to the truth despite her young age remember whose love for abba

[40:20]abdullah was such that proves to us today even 14 centuries after

[40:27]the fact after her death lonely and desecrate and deserted and desecrated

[40:35]in the ruins of sham her name is proof of god how

[40:42]because in spite of her loneliness in spite of the oppression to

[40:47]which she was subjected despite the fact that they killed her with

[40:56]a vengeance and tried to eliminate her and her name from the

[41:00]face of existence today the city of sham is proud to have

[41:08]the grave of this three-year-old orphan there the capital of the beni

[41:17]omega where the green palaces bejeweled by the umayyad kings built with

[41:24]the most cutting-edge architecture of the day and beyond no longer remembers

[41:32]yazid but she is living proof that god is watching over this

[41:46]world that the creator of the universe would not let this injustice

[41:50]go by him that even if it's a three-year-old orphan who was

[41:57]murdered mercerously by her captors that her name is honored that her

[42:02]remembrance is glorified that people will continue to flock in the millions

[42:09]to the shrine of this little orphan of abba abdullah you know

[42:17]one thing that is truly special about rokaya and i think what

[42:21]made her name by the way in the indo-pakistani culture she's referred

[42:27]to as sakina but in fact regardless of her name she was

[42:33]the three-year-old orphan of abba abdullah and what's truly special about her

[42:39]is that she was the first person to embody the statement of

[42:50]imam zaman there's a link between her and the 12th imam you

[42:54]might ask what is that she embodied a statement uttered by our

[42:58]twelfth imam [Music] what's that statement many of you are familiar with

[43:05]it it is in ziarat in which imam zaman says [Music] if

[43:20]the epics of time separated me from you and i couldn't physically

[43:26]be there to defend you [Music] and i couldn't be there to

[43:33]fight those who fought with you [Music] and to show enmity towards

[43:42]those who showed you enmity [Music] then i will remember you and

[43:56]mourn you in the day and the night and i will cry

[44:01]for you instead of tears i shall shed blood out of my

[44:11][Music] out of grief for you and out of lamentation over [Music]

[44:36]i will cry until i die over my grief for you [Music]

[44:47]the three-year-old daughter of abba abdullah embodied the statement of imam azzaman

[44:55]because she was the first to cry for abba until she faced

[45:05]death allahu akbar throughout the journey she had prepared so many things

[45:11]to say to her father she was probably thinking that when i

[45:15]see him because remember she didn't know that abba abdullah had been

[45:22]killed every time she asked for her father she would be told

[45:28]that that he is traveling meaning that the trip of the afterlife

[45:32]she didn't know what had happened to him last she saw abba

[45:39]abdullah is the imam headed towards the battlefield he never returned he

[45:44]never came back so she didn't know what had happened she was

[45:51]anticipating meeting her father some have said that perhaps did to his

[45:59]daughter what rasulullah did what was it rasulullah remember the famous hadith

[46:05]he told his daughter that i will die soon but that you

[46:11]will be the first to join me which is when fatima zara

[46:14]was delighted perhaps imam al-hussein said that to his daughter to give

[46:19]her a sense of comfort that you will be the first to

[46:23]join me my sweetheart and so she anticipated that reunion with her

[46:31]father and as the journey progressed that treacherous painful journey where they

[46:37]were beaten and they were humiliated she must have thought to herself

[46:44]as soon as i see my father i will complain to him

[46:46]as soon as i meet my father i will tell him about

[46:51]my bruises i will tell him about the lash marks i will

[46:54]tell him about the whips i will tell him about my blisters

[46:58]i will tell him how they wounded us i will tell him

[47:03]how they refuse to give us water for so long i will

[47:07]complain to him of what they did to my aunt zainab i

[47:12]will complain to him of what they did to my family members

[47:15]she is anticipating that reunion so that she could say all of

[47:21]these things to her father only when she saw her father's severed

[47:25]head she forgot all of that instead she addressed her father by

[47:31]saying abba oh father has a sharif oh father forget about my

[47:39]pain forget about my bruises forget about my blisters forget about the

[47:47]lash marks father tell me this who decapitated your blessed head oh

[47:53]father o father who dyed your beard with your own blood o

[48:03]father who made me an orphan at this young tender age [Music]

[48:25][Music] to hasten the reappearance of our master [Music] make us at

[49:03]his beck and call oh allah make us among his sincere servants

[49:08]oh allah make us among his loyal defenders and supporters muhammad

0 تعليقات

التالي

Debunking Atheism 01 - God of the Gaps

Transcript

التالي

استكشاف المزيد

يرجى ملاحظة أنه إذا كان عمرك أقل من 18 عامًا ، فلن تتمكن من الوصول إلى هذا الموقع.

التالي

Debunking Atheism 01 - God of the Gaps

Transcript

التالي

استكشاف المزيد

اختيار طريقة الدفع

لغة